Exploring Sudoku

 View Only
  • 1.  The "Ambiguity Avoidance" tactic

    Posted 13 days ago

    I have one Sudoku tactic that I have not seen described.

    If you have four unknown cells that form a rectangle and three of them can only be "x" or "y", then the last one cannot be either "x" or "y".

    The logic behind this is a bit subtle.  Any puzzle submitted for play must have one and only one solution.  Any rectangle of the form x/y/y/x is exactly equivalent to the rectangle y/x/x/y.

    Have fun!



    ------------------------------
    Scott Bowden
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: The "Ambiguity Avoidance" tactic

    Posted 13 days ago

    Well, I have come across puzzles with more than one solution.  My preferred solution method is to come up with pairs of cells (in a square, row, or column) that can only have two values.  Occasionally, I can get to the point where all that is left are multiple pairs of these cells, and either solution is valid.  During the sudoku tournament at the AG, the organizer mentioned this can happen for some puzzles.  



    ------------------------------
    Bill Rock, Allen TX
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: The "Ambiguity Avoidance" tactic

    Posted 13 days ago
    A legitimate puzzle can have only 1 solution. If it has 2 solutions it's called a "deadly pattern" and is not legal.




  • 4.  RE: The "Ambiguity Avoidance" tactic

    Posted 13 days ago

    Sounds like an arbitrary rule. But life is full of many of those.



    ------------------------------
    Bill Rock, Allen TX
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: The "Ambiguity Avoidance" tactic

    Posted 13 days ago
    I understand your thinking it's an arbitrary rule, but I disagree. This rule was made sometime in the 1980s by the Japanese company, Nikoli, that
    first "discovered" "Number Place", which was created by Howard Garns, American architect. Nikoli, a puzzle book publisher, renamed it "Sudoku" and started producing puzzles,
    selling books which caught on so that now Sudoku is popular in most of the world today. Nikoli made this rule, which makes a lot of sense. Now, with this rule, there are patterns
    that can be used to solve many puzzles. Without this rule, many puzzles would be too easy and probably boring very soon.

    Think about it. I've been studying Sudoku about 18 years I'm glad for this rule. Imagine basketball if there was no rule requiring dribbling. Or baseball if there was no rule that required hitting
    a pitched ball with a bat, rather than catching the pitched ball and throwing it someplace. Some rules are important, though originally seen as arbitrary.




  • 6.  RE: The "Ambiguity Avoidance" tactic

    Posted 13 days ago

    I guess I am not enough into sudoku to benefit from the rule.  The technique I have works well enough on the puzzles in the paper, so I am happy to not learn the patterns that make the rule necessary.  But of course if the rule did not exist, the patterns could not be used, and the puzzles would be harder.  Which segues for me into an OT discussion of risk and surfers using jet skis.



    ------------------------------
    Bill Rock, Allen TX
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: The "Ambiguity Avoidance" tactic

    Posted 12 days ago

    I ritually solve a sudoku with checking numbers 1 through 9 in order, filling in squares with the certain number, leaving uncertain others blank.  One run through is generally enough to readily solve the puzzle.   And I don't know that I've ever had a puzzle with two plausible solutions.



    ------------------------------
    Garth Miller
    Elmer City, WA
    ------------------------------